Introduction
Grimes & Warwick specialize in criminal law in San Diego, California.



"International Travel Restrictions"

By Dana M. Grimes, Esq.

Published: January 2009 "Trial Bar News"

It has been said that when you travel, you should remember that a foreign country is not designed to make you comfortable - it is designed to make its own people comfortable.  Our clients often find that foreign customs officials are unsympathetic to traveling Americans with even the most minor criminal records.

Canada

Many American travelers who fly to Canada are startled when they arrive at the Vancouver airport and are deemed members of an Inadmissible Class.  These insulted travelers are forced to make an immediate round trip back to the United States.  It does not take much of a rap sheet to become a member of an Inadmissible Class - even President Bush and Dick Cheney fall into this unflattering category (as they have three DUI's between them).  Members of an Inadmissible Class include those who have been convicted of minor offenses (including shoplifting, driving under the influence, and possession of illegal substances) as well as more serious crimes.  As the Washington Embassy to Canada warns, "Driving while under the influence of alcohol is regarded as an extremely serious offense in Canada."

If you, like Bush, Cheney and millions of other Americans, find yourself deemed unwelcome by Canada, do not despair.  If five years have elapsed since the termination of the custodial portion (if any) of the sentence imposed, you may apply for a Minister's Approval of Rehablititation, which will permanently remove the inadmissibility caused by a conviction.

Presently, immigration officials are able to search background information much more easily than in years past, due to advancements in screening technology.  Soon, "data mining" examinations for past indiscretions may occur at the borders of other countries.  There are accounts of new technology being used at international airports; delays are being caused by the implementation of iris scan technology in England and the Netherlands.  New biometric passports are being used in some parts of Europe, which are scanned by lasers to reveal computer-embedded data and security holograms.  Heathrow Airport in the United Kingdom recently extended a pilot program that allows registered passengers to pass through immigration checks using iris scans.  So far there is no evidence of this technology being connected to a system capable of performing background checks, but it may only be a matter of time before Big Brother really is watching, bringing a new meaning to the ancient truth that no matter how far we travel, we can never escape our past.

Other Countries Which May Deny Entry

Certain countries evaluate Americans with convictions on a case-by-case basis, or at least purport to.  The Malaysian Department of Immigration will deny entry to any foreigner who has been "convicted in any country or state of an offense and sentenced to imprisonment for any term, and has not received a free pardon and by reason of the circumstances connected with the conviction is deemed by the Director General to be an undesirable immigrant."

Japan's relevant statutory scheme somewhat ambigously declares that the Japanese will not allow foreigners to visit who have been convicted and sentenced to imprisonment "with or without work for one year or more, or to an equivalent penalty."  This ban appears to include Americans who never went to prison, but rather served a custodial sentence of work furlough for one year, and it could be construed to apply to ban those sentenced to house arrest.

This past June, Martha Stewart had planned on speaking at the British Royal Academy regarding fashion and leisure industry matters, but was forced to cancel her trip when the United Kingdom Border Agency refused to grant her a visa to enter Great Britian due to her four-year-old federal conviction.  As a result, the British continue to suffer from stodgy interior décor and bland food.  A representative of the United Kingdom Border Agency would not comment on Stewart specifically, saying only that "we continue to oppose entry to the UK of individuals where we believe their presence in the United Kingdom is not conducive to the public good or where they have been found guilty of serious criminal offenses abroad."  The fact that the British think Martha Stewart poses a national security threat is further evidence that they are sissies.

Infamous rapper Snoop Dogg (who has a considerably longer rap sheet - no pun intended - than that of Martha Stewart) has been denied entry to both the U.K. and Australia.  Snoop was denied future entry into the U.K. after he and his party vandalized a duty-free shop at Heathrow Airport by throwing whisky bottles.  (He has had other airport troubles: in 2006, Snoop was detained at John Wayne Airport in Orange County, after airport screeners found a collapsible baton in his carry-on bag, and he was arrested at Bob Hope Airport in Burbank when he was found in the passenger loading zone in possession of marijuana and a firearm.)  Snoop, of course, has had other gun and drug convictions, and he is affliliated with a Los Angeles gang.  The Australians (perhaps reflecting upon the fact that they are descendants of convicts themselves) lifted their own ban against Snoop, stating that his charitable works outweigh his convictions.

Passports and Visas

Many countries do not require a visa for entry; a United States passport will suffice for most vacations.  U.S. citizens who have suffered a felony conviction can generally receive and use a U.S. passport.  However, it is possible that in a specific case, the terms of parole, probation or the judge's order may deny the defendant a right to a passport or international travel.  Often, defendants on supervised release for a pending federal criminal case will be required to turn over their passports.  Historically, there is one type of felony that prevents a person from getting a passport: treason.  If you're convicted of treason, international travel is the least of your worries.

Even if you are in possession of a valid passport, it is not advisable to travel with an outstanding warrant, even if it is decades old and was issued for some silly technical mistake that you never cleared up.  We have anecdotal evidence that cruise ships call in their passenger lists to customs when they come back to port in the United States, and if you have an outstanding warrant, a Zodiac full of Coast Guards in flak jackets are likely to board the ship and arrest you at gunpoint in the middle of dinner.  When making arrests, certain law enforcement agencies, the DEA and U.S. Coast Guard included, have a policy to re-create scenes from Bruce Willis movies.

Non-Criminal Travel Restrictions

Some Middle Eastern or North African countries will not issue visas or allow entry if your passport indicates travel to Israel.  Other countries apply the ban inconsistently, sometimes refusing and at other times allowing entry when a passport shows evidence of a trip to Israel.  The policies of the countries in the Middle East and North Africa toward foreign visitors vary greatly.  Some countries encourage tourism and put few restrictions on American visitors, while other countries do not allow tourism and carefully regulate all business travel.  You cannot go to Afghanistan and some other war torn nations - leave that to Anderson Cooper and Christiane Amanpour.

In a number of Middle Eastern countries, even those that allow tourist visas, a woman needs the permission of her husband, and children need the permission of their father to leave the country.  If you travel or your children travel, be aware of the laws of the country you plan to visit.  Once abroad, you are subject to the whims of whatever lawless country you are in.  The United States Constitution is a wonderful thing - sometimes the risks are not worth leaving our free society.

Borders: Where Everyone Gets Treated Like a Criminal

One might think that a U.S. Customs agent would need some reasonable and articulable suspicion that a crime had occurred in order to review the personal files on a U.S. citizen's laptop or cell phone, but that is not the state of the law.  The Customs agent only needs a character trait for nosiness.

According to the recent Ninth Circuit case United States v. Arnold, 523 F.3d 941, the Fourth Amendment does not require government agents to have reasonable suspicion before searching laptops or other digital devices at the border, including at international airports.  ICE agents are likely to use this opinion to argue that every property search at the border is constitutionally acceptable.  The lower court previously ruled that today's digital devices are an "extension of our own memory," but the Ninth Circuit overturned that decision, and expanded the so-called border exception to the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches to apply not only to suitcases, but also to electronics.  ICE agents can turn electronics on, search files and web histories, and open, read, and print out documents.  The Arnold ruling did not, however, clarify whether a traveler has to help the government search his computer, so we advise that travelers should utilize password protection and even data encryption when forced to travel with a laptop full of confidential business files, or a Blackberry containing journal entries, financial information, and personal photographs.  You may have caught a few tuna on your trip to Mexico, but it is when you come back across the border that the real fishing expedition will begin.

Hits: 796

© Copyright 2005 - 2010 GrimesandWarwick.com. All rights reserved.
Web Site Automation by Business Creator Pro.